Monday, December 24, 2007
yo yo...so there is this movie scene i am thinking of but cant remember what movie it is...its an execution scene, they strap the man up and it seems like the guards dont want it to happen, and are kind of waiting for the red phone to ring.....the lethal injection jsut starts when the phone rings and the guard answering says "its too late...it already started!" but they stop in before the chemical that stops the heart goes in....anyone remember the movie?
yo yo....so i was about to get ready to watch OZ and i flipped past the devil wears prada and watched for 30 seconds or so and got hooked and watched the rest of the movie and enjoyed it a lot. now i have to go re-watch he intro to that office episode where michael treated pam like andy.
Saturday, December 15, 2007
yo yo...so i was watching a discussion about water boarding and someone made an interesting point...someone argued how we shouldnt stoop to the terrorists people and someone else said "we're not stooping to their level...they don't water board people, they cut people's heads off"
Thursday, December 13, 2007
yo yo...so last nite i was playing call of duty 4 and this character playing in the name was called "hot_brunette1"....during one game she talked with her microphone and she actually was a girl(from australia) and later that game someone killed her and sighed, in a moan-y kind of way, and i thought "wow, she DOES sound hot" and right after i thought that 2 other players with microphones said "whoa she does sound hot"...it was pretty funny...she was good too which made it cooler...she won one game and came in 2nd in the other(to me)
Wednesday, December 12, 2007
Apparently Barak Obama has used cocaine. This seems like a poor life choice. Admitting to it is probably an equally poor life choice. Oh well.
Tuesday, December 11, 2007
yo yo...often times you hear people who criticize the media and the intrusiveness in our society and overall prevalence...i actually like that in our society. I feel that the investigative nature of our media actually serves to protect our citizens. i think that having the media be as powerful as it is here would prevent some injustices that would otherwise not be heard of.
thats also why i kind of like the 2 party system here in america. i feel that having 2 parties prevents corruption. whenever you see in movies where the government has some sort of scandal and tries to quiet some sort of witness to some sort of crime(happens a lot) its kind of scary. think about if your daughter was natalee halloway. without the way our media is it would have been hard to get the same government involvement.
Friday, December 07, 2007
six days.
next saturday, perhaps there will be a small gathering.
i hope america is ready to have me back.
next saturday, perhaps there will be a small gathering.
i hope america is ready to have me back.
Monday, December 03, 2007
yo yo....if rape is a felony, cock teasing should at least be a misdemeanor
Saturday, December 01, 2007
Konichiwa
Ni Hao, Hello, Namaste, Hola, Zdravstvuite, Marhaban, Ei Je, Bom Dia, Selemat Pagi, Bonjour
Bless me father for I have sinned, it has been 4 years 2 months and 9 days since my last post.
I was asked for some input in the form of a "quote" from an anonymous blogger on a political subject, and I figured, what the hell, I like to rant and rave about shit...let me write a blog entry.
DISCLAIMER: I just got finished writing 3 essays for online classes. These consist mainly of ranting bullshit and this post is likely to follow suit.
so...American Politics. As a degenerate gambler and an odds junkie I will start by giving you a few betting lines offered on various sports betting websites. (the way that this works is that if you bet $100....the positive number will be your return...the negative is the reverse....bet X to win $100...i.e. if you bet $300 on Hillary and she wins, you win $100 - bet $100 on Micheal Moore and he wins, you win $500,000)
Hillary Clinton -300
Barak Obama +350
Rudy Giuliani +300
Arnold Schwarzenegger- +25,000
Bill Maher +100,000
Micheal Moore +500,000
Let's look this over. Hillary Clinton is massively favored to win according to the worlds foremost statisticians. No not pollsters or political analysts, bookies. If a political analyst gets the wrong data, he still collects his paycheck. If a bookmaker gets it wrong in Vegas, he loses about
$8 million. Her next adversary as Democrats go is Barak Obama.(this is where Holden Caulfield's classmates would yell "digression") I recently read (and yes finished...you can borrow it Mark) Obama's "The Audacity of Hope" Obama's vision of American politics, economics and foreign policy are profound. In my opinion, he's the perfect American candidate. Raised poor by a single mother, then well educated (Harvard Law) and brought into the life of privilege which most politicians share, but were born into. A very respected professor and lawyer, but still no stranger to the plight of the everyday American. Obama seems to be very in tune to everything that is going on in the U.S. right now. The plight of the American worker, the dangers in our foreign policy, the deficit, overspending, underfunding, over-taxation etc etc etc... He's a black candidate who sees the plight of African Americans, but does not propose any solution or proposal that even the average Republican would contest. He strikes an almost perfect balance of Republican sense and savvy with Democratic compassion. Myself being a self-professed cynic to the nth degree found myself at many times during the book accusing Obama of being nothing more than a clever wordsmith with a masterful talent of bullshitting both sides of an issue. But the more I think about his ideas and thoughts the more I see that they are simply solutions. Compromises. What democracy's goal has always been. He talks about the polarization of American politics and how there's no longer such thing as a pro-life Democrat or a republican who is against the war. The political structure no longer allows it. He calls for increased cooperation and compromise in government and has some really progressive ideas of how to fix every problem currently pressing in the U.S. - Looks great on paper. It remains to be seen how feasible these ideas are in practice. Obama's writing style stands alone as an attraction to this book. His diction and style are among the best in this genre and he does an amazing job of conveying his emotion through his words. Read it...Republican or Democrat. That Said....as Herminio, the illiterate, silver-toothed short order cook at New York Country Club would say [enyoy] your Republican. This is where Vegas is whacked out of their gourd. Hillary is a 3 to 1 favorite. Obama is not far behind. Neither is Giuliani. Looking back at past presidents' heritages, religions, and occupations, we find almost all of them to be WASPS. Of British decent, a background in law or military and some form of protestant Catholic. Although we seem to live in a very progressive society, it seems as though there are some latent rules for the presidency. Our only Roman Catholic, Irish (how exotic) President was assassinated in office. It is a far cry from and Irish Catholic to a woman or an African American with a Muslim father. There are parts of the country that just aren't ready, unfortunately. So as far as Vegas goes. Fuck you. I'm sticking with Giuliani as the favorite. Even if the Democrats are the majority, there's not enough who are willing to put a black guy or a woman in office. And for those of you who were planning on putting your money on Shwarzenegger, please put as much money as you can on him. Natural selection will see you rightfully broke and living on the streets considering the constitutional ban of a non natural born citizen being president. (Although I believe the odds here are better than when BetOnSports offered 1500 to 1 that David Beckham would join the Spice Girls, they would rename themselves The Beckham Girls and tour the world) I shit you not. The main problem is that if he joins the group and tours the world, but the don't change their name to The Beckham Girls, you lose the bet.
In closing. To paraphrase MostOffensive Video...
Fuck Hillary. Fuck her up and down and on her face. Stomp on her ass till she be beggin' for muthafuckin' mercy. Beat her ass with a closet stick cuz I can't stand that white bitch. Cuz their ain't no thing like slapping y'all across the face with my John Holmes while sippin' Hennessy, you Jew-banger.
Hillary (when prompted about raising the cap on the payroll tax above $97,000):
"It is absolutely the case that there are people that would find that burdensome. I represent Firefighters, I represent School Supervisors.
Barak: (paraphrased slightly)
Fuck you Hillary, you cunt. Only 6% of Americans make over $97,000 a year. Stop trying to call it a burden on the middle class. That's the upper class, you rug-munching slut.
Zai Jian, Goodbye, Alavidha, Adios, Do Svidaniya, Salam, Shuva Bidhai, Saya Pergi Dulu, Au Revoir
Ni Hao, Hello, Namaste, Hola, Zdravstvuite, Marhaban, Ei Je, Bom Dia, Selemat Pagi, Bonjour
Bless me father for I have sinned, it has been 4 years 2 months and 9 days since my last post.
I was asked for some input in the form of a "quote" from an anonymous blogger on a political subject, and I figured, what the hell, I like to rant and rave about shit...let me write a blog entry.
DISCLAIMER: I just got finished writing 3 essays for online classes. These consist mainly of ranting bullshit and this post is likely to follow suit.
so...American Politics. As a degenerate gambler and an odds junkie I will start by giving you a few betting lines offered on various sports betting websites. (the way that this works is that if you bet $100....the positive number will be your return...the negative is the reverse....bet X to win $100...i.e. if you bet $300 on Hillary and she wins, you win $100 - bet $100 on Micheal Moore and he wins, you win $500,000)
Hillary Clinton -300
Barak Obama +350
Rudy Giuliani +300
Arnold Schwarzenegger- +25,000
Bill Maher +100,000
Micheal Moore +500,000
Let's look this over. Hillary Clinton is massively favored to win according to the worlds foremost statisticians. No not pollsters or political analysts, bookies. If a political analyst gets the wrong data, he still collects his paycheck. If a bookmaker gets it wrong in Vegas, he loses about
$8 million. Her next adversary as Democrats go is Barak Obama.(this is where Holden Caulfield's classmates would yell "digression") I recently read (and yes finished...you can borrow it Mark) Obama's "The Audacity of Hope" Obama's vision of American politics, economics and foreign policy are profound. In my opinion, he's the perfect American candidate. Raised poor by a single mother, then well educated (Harvard Law) and brought into the life of privilege which most politicians share, but were born into. A very respected professor and lawyer, but still no stranger to the plight of the everyday American. Obama seems to be very in tune to everything that is going on in the U.S. right now. The plight of the American worker, the dangers in our foreign policy, the deficit, overspending, underfunding, over-taxation etc etc etc... He's a black candidate who sees the plight of African Americans, but does not propose any solution or proposal that even the average Republican would contest. He strikes an almost perfect balance of Republican sense and savvy with Democratic compassion. Myself being a self-professed cynic to the nth degree found myself at many times during the book accusing Obama of being nothing more than a clever wordsmith with a masterful talent of bullshitting both sides of an issue. But the more I think about his ideas and thoughts the more I see that they are simply solutions. Compromises. What democracy's goal has always been. He talks about the polarization of American politics and how there's no longer such thing as a pro-life Democrat or a republican who is against the war. The political structure no longer allows it. He calls for increased cooperation and compromise in government and has some really progressive ideas of how to fix every problem currently pressing in the U.S. - Looks great on paper. It remains to be seen how feasible these ideas are in practice. Obama's writing style stands alone as an attraction to this book. His diction and style are among the best in this genre and he does an amazing job of conveying his emotion through his words. Read it...Republican or Democrat. That Said....as Herminio, the illiterate, silver-toothed short order cook at New York Country Club would say [enyoy] your Republican. This is where Vegas is whacked out of their gourd. Hillary is a 3 to 1 favorite. Obama is not far behind. Neither is Giuliani. Looking back at past presidents' heritages, religions, and occupations, we find almost all of them to be WASPS. Of British decent, a background in law or military and some form of protestant Catholic. Although we seem to live in a very progressive society, it seems as though there are some latent rules for the presidency. Our only Roman Catholic, Irish (how exotic) President was assassinated in office. It is a far cry from and Irish Catholic to a woman or an African American with a Muslim father. There are parts of the country that just aren't ready, unfortunately. So as far as Vegas goes. Fuck you. I'm sticking with Giuliani as the favorite. Even if the Democrats are the majority, there's not enough who are willing to put a black guy or a woman in office. And for those of you who were planning on putting your money on Shwarzenegger, please put as much money as you can on him. Natural selection will see you rightfully broke and living on the streets considering the constitutional ban of a non natural born citizen being president. (Although I believe the odds here are better than when BetOnSports offered 1500 to 1 that David Beckham would join the Spice Girls, they would rename themselves The Beckham Girls and tour the world) I shit you not. The main problem is that if he joins the group and tours the world, but the don't change their name to The Beckham Girls, you lose the bet.
In closing. To paraphrase MostOffensive Video...
Fuck Hillary. Fuck her up and down and on her face. Stomp on her ass till she be beggin' for muthafuckin' mercy. Beat her ass with a closet stick cuz I can't stand that white bitch. Cuz their ain't no thing like slapping y'all across the face with my John Holmes while sippin' Hennessy, you Jew-banger.
Hillary (when prompted about raising the cap on the payroll tax above $97,000):
"It is absolutely the case that there are people that would find that burdensome. I represent Firefighters, I represent School Supervisors.
Barak: (paraphrased slightly)
Fuck you Hillary, you cunt. Only 6% of Americans make over $97,000 a year. Stop trying to call it a burden on the middle class. That's the upper class, you rug-munching slut.
Zai Jian, Goodbye, Alavidha, Adios, Do Svidaniya, Salam, Shuva Bidhai, Saya Pergi Dulu, Au Revoir
Labels: Barak Obama Hillary Most Offensive
first, to start, mark, its a blog, you can bring up any topic you wish, so feel free to express yourself whenever you want...now to jump on the bandwagon
well, in regards to the youtube debate, thats cnn's fault, they can only respond to questions that they give to them, so thats why healthcare wasnt discussed,...and as far as thompson saying roe v wade is the most important, i dont think he actually thinks that, it was just because the question he was asked was about abortion
i'm starting to like gov. huckabee more and more as i watch the debates(since no one seems to talk about republicans i'll do that, vincent's prolly afraid they're gonna snag him along with bin laden)....although thompson has a witty response hear and there his speech seems very unorganized when he answers questions....mitt romney lost many points with me after totally avoiding a question, and i give props to anderson cooper, he kept prodding and he kept not answering(it was about gays in the military)....there are some things i like about ron paul, mainly his distaste of government spending, i want someone who will cut costs, its ridiculous how much money is wasted, however idk if i would feel safe with his foreign relations policies....i like tom tancredos views on immigration, however he'll never win and i cant recall hearing his views on anything else, with gulianni i liked how on a stage with all gun owners he wasnt afraid to say that he beleives gun ownership is a right, but should have some regulations, which is fair, its kind of ridiculous how easy it is in some states to acquire one....for me right now on the republican side its between him and huckabee
on the democratic side, i'm pretty objective about hillary...i dont mind her being a woman or a clinton or a lesbian...tho i do mind her performances in the debates as jofi mentioned....i dont care what jon edwards ever says, i would never vote for him, he comes off as very not genuine...as far as barack, i'll just relay things stephen has said about him since he just read his book and has a man crush on him...he saysa he's an excellent writer and writes as if he's a genius and has pretty much fallen in love with him after reading it...i wont elaborate as i think he might post...although i watched him on pbs the other day and liked his chat with the black host
and as a general thought....idk about everyone here, but i know "someone" who will not even watch republican debates cuz "they dotn like" republicans....i like to watch both so i can get a better overrall pictures because although i think lately ive been leaning republican i don't consider myself either, i think its silly to.... does everyone watch both or just democratic?
well, in regards to the youtube debate, thats cnn's fault, they can only respond to questions that they give to them, so thats why healthcare wasnt discussed,...and as far as thompson saying roe v wade is the most important, i dont think he actually thinks that, it was just because the question he was asked was about abortion
i'm starting to like gov. huckabee more and more as i watch the debates(since no one seems to talk about republicans i'll do that, vincent's prolly afraid they're gonna snag him along with bin laden)....although thompson has a witty response hear and there his speech seems very unorganized when he answers questions....mitt romney lost many points with me after totally avoiding a question, and i give props to anderson cooper, he kept prodding and he kept not answering(it was about gays in the military)....there are some things i like about ron paul, mainly his distaste of government spending, i want someone who will cut costs, its ridiculous how much money is wasted, however idk if i would feel safe with his foreign relations policies....i like tom tancredos views on immigration, however he'll never win and i cant recall hearing his views on anything else, with gulianni i liked how on a stage with all gun owners he wasnt afraid to say that he beleives gun ownership is a right, but should have some regulations, which is fair, its kind of ridiculous how easy it is in some states to acquire one....for me right now on the republican side its between him and huckabee
on the democratic side, i'm pretty objective about hillary...i dont mind her being a woman or a clinton or a lesbian...tho i do mind her performances in the debates as jofi mentioned....i dont care what jon edwards ever says, i would never vote for him, he comes off as very not genuine...as far as barack, i'll just relay things stephen has said about him since he just read his book and has a man crush on him...he saysa he's an excellent writer and writes as if he's a genius and has pretty much fallen in love with him after reading it...i wont elaborate as i think he might post...although i watched him on pbs the other day and liked his chat with the black host
and as a general thought....idk about everyone here, but i know "someone" who will not even watch republican debates cuz "they dotn like" republicans....i like to watch both so i can get a better overrall pictures because although i think lately ive been leaning republican i don't consider myself either, i think its silly to.... does everyone watch both or just democratic?
Ok, now that we've finally reached a blogging topic on which I feel I can express myself.... I am back. In my opinion I feel like Hillary pussyfooted around a lot of questions giving partial answers in the last debate. I prefer the views of Kucinich, although he'll never get the nomination, or Chris Dodd. Kucinich voted against the Patriot act and the War while people are changing their positions on it (which they are entitled to do, considering the circumstances and procedure in which the war was handled). Personally I feel that the top 3 leaders in the democratic polls have more hype than anything. Contrary to that, on the republican ticket, Guilliani is clearly leading in the polls, and his viewpoints that are more liberal (pertaining to abortion) and his history in New York can give him more of an edge over candidates of either party.
Now I am a registered Democrat, but I feel that if you're going to vote at all that you should know what a person's viewpoints are and not just vote party. The past YouTube Republican debate left me quite empty on topics that are really an issue at this day and age. Thompson stated that the number one priority in America is to overturn Roe v. Wade..... what bullshit is that? How about concentrating on our welfare problem, healthcare issues, THE WAR? In the past debates if I were to choose winners it would be Dems: Biden/Kucinich and Rep: Huckabee/Paul. These people I feel answered the questions most directly and sincerely out of all the presidential hopefuls. What would your pick be purely on the debates?
Now I am a registered Democrat, but I feel that if you're going to vote at all that you should know what a person's viewpoints are and not just vote party. The past YouTube Republican debate left me quite empty on topics that are really an issue at this day and age. Thompson stated that the number one priority in America is to overturn Roe v. Wade..... what bullshit is that? How about concentrating on our welfare problem, healthcare issues, THE WAR? In the past debates if I were to choose winners it would be Dems: Biden/Kucinich and Rep: Huckabee/Paul. These people I feel answered the questions most directly and sincerely out of all the presidential hopefuls. What would your pick be purely on the debates?
what up.
in response to vincent, i find hillary clinton, despite her obvious influence, distasteful. her speeches leave me more unnerved than comforted (there is a large hate machine working against her), and i feel regardless of her obvious power (ranked among top three most powerful woman in the us according to forbes) she will NOT be the kind of president we need right now. what we need is a leader who is new, someone who can bring the presidency back to it's former status in the mind of americans. if she runs, she might lose. as much as this country is sick of the terrible misdeeds of the republicans, there is a giant chunk of america that is not even close to ready to elect a woman president.
speaking of policy, she did not support spitzer (although she said she did) and as much as i am disappointed that he didn't go through with his driver's license initiative, i'm more disappointed she flipped her support of it. i like her policies generally speaking, but i like barack better, and i think he will be able to garner more support.
also, i did not appreciate clinton snapping at obama for wanting to open up talks with hostile nations. she made him look stupid for answering a question the exact same way she would have, if it was presented to her first. watch obama speak, he is much more motivating and i think he will be a better face for americans to look up to. i am open to any and all debate on the subject.
oh, and karen, go jump in a lake.
in response to vincent, i find hillary clinton, despite her obvious influence, distasteful. her speeches leave me more unnerved than comforted (there is a large hate machine working against her), and i feel regardless of her obvious power (ranked among top three most powerful woman in the us according to forbes) she will NOT be the kind of president we need right now. what we need is a leader who is new, someone who can bring the presidency back to it's former status in the mind of americans. if she runs, she might lose. as much as this country is sick of the terrible misdeeds of the republicans, there is a giant chunk of america that is not even close to ready to elect a woman president.
speaking of policy, she did not support spitzer (although she said she did) and as much as i am disappointed that he didn't go through with his driver's license initiative, i'm more disappointed she flipped her support of it. i like her policies generally speaking, but i like barack better, and i think he will be able to garner more support.
also, i did not appreciate clinton snapping at obama for wanting to open up talks with hostile nations. she made him look stupid for answering a question the exact same way she would have, if it was presented to her first. watch obama speak, he is much more motivating and i think he will be a better face for americans to look up to. i am open to any and all debate on the subject.
oh, and karen, go jump in a lake.
