Sunday, June 21, 2009
yo yo...i am SO annoyed right now. (warning more torture talk)
so on the episode of 24 i was jsut watching jack bauer discovered that one of the senate members chief of staff was in kahootz with a terrorist who was known to be plotting a large scale attack within the hour. his level of kahootz was 100% confirmed.
jack started torturing(just electrocution, nothing major) the guy to get the info, and he JUST started spilling when the president and the senator intervened and ordered him to stop. Now, the senator is spearheading a campaign to have jack indicted for his use of torture, so he is joe no torture no matter what. the president(frumpy twat) stopped jack before he could get the most important part of the confession, and thought she could get him to talk by offering him immunity(no dice) or threatening to charge him with treason. WHOA!!!! then of course he asked for his lawyer and didnt say another word. so, this leads me to my next point...in this situation there are three possible outcomes...lets examine.
(all situations assume he gives info, which was not the case)
1. Jack uses a tazer on him, guy gives info
2. President gives a TERRORIST immunity
3. President charges him with treason, he gets put to death anyway
now, here are the differences, and lets see if it makes sense.
1+2...ASSUMING he gives up the info after getting immunity(which in the show he didnt) u get the info either way, but in one case u have a terrorist who was electrocuted, and the other case you have a terrorist free and roaming the streets...that's what it comes down to...HOW can you justify that being better??
3. this case shouldn't even matter because if it went that far that means he didnt talk and the plot got carried out anyway, so many die...PLUS you're killing someone anyway...PLUS you're costing taxpayers a ton of money
I am actually rooting for the terrorists now so far, until they apologize to jack
in other news
- My ipod wire got caught on poles and parts of machines SO many times today at the gym, i was one instance away from committing a movie worthy act of violence
- I discovered the perfect combination for a cheat meal...everytime i decide to eat whatever i want in a meal its very stressfull...you want to satisfy as many tastebuds as possible, but you have money+appetite to consider...nothing worse than not being able to finish you're food...and you always regret not eating a certain junk food category...tonites group is very good
-Pizza
-microwavable brownie/ice cream sundae
-twizzlers
this covers grease, chocolate, ice cream, sweets, small snackable things...i was gonna go with sour patch watermelonsbut i really do love twizzlers...you can eat them so many different ways...big bites, tiny squirrel bites(my fav), in a highly chlorinated pool( we all know who you are)
so on the episode of 24 i was jsut watching jack bauer discovered that one of the senate members chief of staff was in kahootz with a terrorist who was known to be plotting a large scale attack within the hour. his level of kahootz was 100% confirmed.
jack started torturing(just electrocution, nothing major) the guy to get the info, and he JUST started spilling when the president and the senator intervened and ordered him to stop. Now, the senator is spearheading a campaign to have jack indicted for his use of torture, so he is joe no torture no matter what. the president(frumpy twat) stopped jack before he could get the most important part of the confession, and thought she could get him to talk by offering him immunity(no dice) or threatening to charge him with treason. WHOA!!!! then of course he asked for his lawyer and didnt say another word. so, this leads me to my next point...in this situation there are three possible outcomes...lets examine.
(all situations assume he gives info, which was not the case)
1. Jack uses a tazer on him, guy gives info
2. President gives a TERRORIST immunity
3. President charges him with treason, he gets put to death anyway
now, here are the differences, and lets see if it makes sense.
1+2...ASSUMING he gives up the info after getting immunity(which in the show he didnt) u get the info either way, but in one case u have a terrorist who was electrocuted, and the other case you have a terrorist free and roaming the streets...that's what it comes down to...HOW can you justify that being better??
3. this case shouldn't even matter because if it went that far that means he didnt talk and the plot got carried out anyway, so many die...PLUS you're killing someone anyway...PLUS you're costing taxpayers a ton of money
I am actually rooting for the terrorists now so far, until they apologize to jack
in other news
- My ipod wire got caught on poles and parts of machines SO many times today at the gym, i was one instance away from committing a movie worthy act of violence
- I discovered the perfect combination for a cheat meal...everytime i decide to eat whatever i want in a meal its very stressfull...you want to satisfy as many tastebuds as possible, but you have money+appetite to consider...nothing worse than not being able to finish you're food...and you always regret not eating a certain junk food category...tonites group is very good
-Pizza
-microwavable brownie/ice cream sundae
-twizzlers
this covers grease, chocolate, ice cream, sweets, small snackable things...i was gonna go with sour patch watermelonsbut i really do love twizzlers...you can eat them so many different ways...big bites, tiny squirrel bites(my fav), in a highly chlorinated pool( we all know who you are)
Comments:
Post a Comment
